The last few weeks have been very revealing of the true agenda of the pro-abortion left. The pro-abortion side would prefer we call them “pro-choice.” Since logic is my main goal in this blog, I’d like to examine if this passes as what anyone would agree is true choice. Let’s start with the big non-controversy of the Tim Tebow Super Bowl ad. Before anybody had seen the ad, the pro-abortion fanatics where hysterical that anyone would dare put a pro-life ad on TV. The pro-abortion left are not “pro-choice;” they are only for their choice. Anyone who dares propose anything other than abortion for any reason has to be stopped at any cost. Not only are they not pro-choice, but they are for forcing you to only see what they approve. If anyone dares to have a different view they will do whatever they can to stop you. This is choice? This is more akin to tyranny.
The “pro-choice” crowd, we’re told, is tolerant and giving; they love the poor and are for freedom of expression. Really? What they’ve shown here, in no uncertain terms, is that they are not pro-choice, but only for their choice. They are not tolerant; they’re very intolerant of any views other than their own. A story in the Washington Post by a pro-choice advocate understands clearly that this is the case. Here is a compelling article by Sally Jenkins: click here to read it.
Just today, we learned that a 19-year old teenager in Ohio was denied a state speaking award by an Ohio legislator because the award was for a pro-life speech. These are the people who claim that they’re pro-choice, tolerant and open. The O’Reilly Factor on the Fox News Channel interviewed the teen on tonight’s show.